The positives that were said are:
- The music was upbeat
- The lighting contrast was good between when everything was good and when everything went bad
- The images of the gorey bloody hands were good
- The begining is effective because it makes you bond with the character
- The use of camera angles were really effective, like the canted angle
- Close up of the eye
- The fuzzy image at the end
- The sound of the boy at the end was good and jumpy
The negatives that were said are:
- The doctor shot wasn't needed because it took the mystery factor away, also the light and the bed was enough to set the setting.
- Get rid of the heart monitor
- The booms in the soundtrack didn't match the intertitles
- Not too sure what the story line was
- Not sure what the children were or why they are in there
- Too many hand shots
- Bit untidy could be linked better
The audience feedback has helped me to distinguish what the effective aspects of the trailer was and what parts weren't so good so that i can improve it and use their views as a guidline by choosing the most common criticisms that were repeated so i definetely no they weren't good and i will do the same for the positive aspects and may improve them. I have learnt that horror trailers have to be very carefully tuned so that the soundtrack matches the film especially when the distressing images are on screen, the soundtrack has to add to the impact by tempo or pitch. No criticisms on the story line was mentioned when i said to them what it was at the end which suggests the horror story is good but i do have to make it clearer.
Explain more - for example WHY was the doctor shot not needed? Also, can you sum up in terms of horror gtenre conventions AND how effective they thought it was AS A TEASER TRAILER.
ReplyDelete